The key lies in the "consideration" of the word. To sort out the following points:
1 If China develops fuel cell vehicles with a balance, it should be complementary to the development of pure electric vehicles. How to add it? The buses are fully electrically operated and the charging piles must be in place. Fuel cell buses must be developed and must be equipped with hydrogen refueling stations. As a result, charging piles and hydrogen refueling stations are not complementary relations? There is a single option between the two.
2Hydrogen is not a primary energy source. Basically, it originates from the products after “consumption” of electrical energy. First, industrial by-products, and second, wind power (other energy sources) generate electricity that does not meet the demand for online power. There is a paradox that industrial by-products are rich in hydrogen, they need to be purified (and they must consume electricity), they have to be used for cars, and they must build a network for transporting and supplying hydrogen. The current on-board fuel cell is still used for electric motors after reducing power generation. Why is this (electric-hydrogen-electric) cycle multiple energy forms?
3 What is the positioning of China's development of fuel cell vehicles? Is it tracking? Is it beyond? The key advanced technologies of fuel cell vehicles are in foreign countries and China has no advantage.
4 China's development of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, because other countries have advanced technology? Do we have to chase it? With hybrid car technology, Japan is more advanced than us. Why don't we chase it?
5 The cost of hydrogen battery modules is high, and the technology core is foreign. Without national financial subsidies, this car cannot be applied widely. Take Chinese tax money to subsidize foreign technology (products)? There is no reasonable way to explain this to the Chinese people.